DTCC Signs MOU With Chinese Counterpart (Securities Industry News)

文章摘要 本文报道了2007年6月美国存托信托与清算公司(DTCC)与中国证券登记结算有限公司(SDC)在北京签署合作谅解备忘录(MOU)的事件。该MOU确立了双方在证券存管与清算事务上开展信息交换和项目合作的法律与业务框架,旨在促进两国金融市场繁荣,推动跨境投资,并为未来建立业务联动奠定基础。文章指出,中国证券市场尚处发展期,SDC希望通过借鉴DTCC超过35年的全球最大存管机构经验,提升其后台运营的安全性与效率。同时,双方合作被视作中国证券市场对外开放的重要一步,有助于降低跨境交易成本与结算风险,吸引更多国际投资者,但受制于中国资本项目管制,短期内实现全面跨境交易仍有距离。本文对理解国际证券清算合作的法律架构具有实务参考价值。

June 18, 2007 - Depository Trust & Clearing Corp. (DTCC) of New York and its Chinese counterpart, the China Securities Depository & Clearing Corp. (SD&C), have signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU), launching formal cooperation in areas of information exchange and "projects of interest," the companies said last week after sealing the agreement June 8 in Beijing.

The agreement constitutes a legal and business framework for the two organizations to work together at both senior and staff levels, DTCC said.

SD&C was formed six years ago, with a mission of building "an open, flexible and unified securities registration and settlement system in line with international standards and practices," the organization's vice chairman and general manager, Ying Jin, said at the signing ceremony. SD&C had previously established relationships with stock exchanges and depository and clearing institutions in Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania, South America and Africa, she said.

"As the central securities depository of this young market, we are trying our best to provide safe, stable and efficient back-office support for the market, which means a huge responsibility for us," Jin said. "With the development of China's securities market, SD&C is enriching its knowledge and experience and exploring an innovative way of development."

In the wording of the MOU, the two sides will "establish a basis of cooperation in securities depository and clearing matters to help foster the prosperity of their financial markets, promote cross-border investment and explore opportunities for cooperation in both depository and clearing operations and in the establishment of an operation linkage." The parties also "anticipate developing a closer working relationship" in the future.

With more than 35 years of experience as the world's biggest domestic depository and operator of the largest post-trade infrastructure, DTCC can impart knowledge and guidance on many of the issues China will be facing, Mary Ann Callahan, DTCC managing director for international affairs, told Securities Industry News. "Not all of those solutions necessarily will work in China," she said. "But simply having an opportunity to discuss the how and why of our functioning will provide new insights and solutions for China to consider."

The agreement is an early step that could conceivably lead to actions on cross-border trading later. "We believe that as investors continue to invest more globally each year it is increasingly important that the post-trade infrastructure develop and change to support such trading much better than it does currently," said Callahan. The MOU "allows both DTCC and the SD&C to build systems and operations that will work more efficiently with each other ... and hopefully will result in a more cost-efficient and better way for investors to buy and sell stock in both our countries."

Market Clout

Long operational experience isn't the only reason that the Chinese look to the U.S. for guidance. "Since the U.S. represents the primary base of foreign investment and potential investment flowing into the China markets, it makes sense that SD&C sign the MOU," said Matthew Bienfang, brokerage and wealth management services research director at TowerGroup in Needham, Mass. "This is the fastest and most efficient way to open those markets to U.S. brokerages."

International investments into China are limited to purchases of stocks listed in Hong Kong and other international exchanges, or through the limited investment opportunities offered through China's qualified foreign institutional investor program, currently being increased to $30 billion since the previous $10 billion allotment was used up.

With DTCC's help, SD&C will be able to bring the Chinese system more in line with U.S. standards and practices, Bienfang said. "This will in turn grease the capital flow into China's markets by reducing the cost and operational and settlement risk. SD&C has an opportunity to refine a model that offers familiarity and continuity to which U.S. brokers are more likely to respond positively and adopt more rapidly."

This isn't the first MOU that DTCC has with a Chinese clearing corporation. In December it signed one with a related organization, the China Government Depository Trust & Clearing Co., which handles clearing and settlement for the Chinese bond market. The SD&C agreement tightens DTCC's links with the post-trade infrastructure in China, said Callahan.

According to Chambers Yang, a partner at Shanghai-based law firm Haworth & Lexon, this deal could help lead to the eventual development of a global market for securities.
"SD&C can help U.S. investors to invest in China through DTCC," Yang said, "while DTCC can help Chinese investors to invest in U.S. through SD&C." That will not happen in the near term, however, because of the closed nature of the Chinese stock market.

Still, the MOU "is an important first step for future cooperation," commented Wenli Yuan, a Beijing-based senior analyst with Boston research firm Celent. DTCC, for its part, "could get a better understanding of business in China, a more and more important market in the financial industry," she said.

Benoit Florencon contributed to this report.
(原文参见:http://www.securitiesindustry.com/article.cfm?articleid=20790&did=4&page=3)

杨春宝一级律师简介

杨春宝一级律师,大成上海高级合伙人、资本市场部主任、国资基金研究中心主任,大成中国区私募基金专业带头人、科技与文化法律研究中心联合牵头人。执业30余年,长期从事私募基金、投融资、并购重组法律服务,尤其对对赌研究颇深且具有非常丰富的实战经验,并专注于金融机构股权投资业务。2004年起多次入选The Legal 500"私募基金"和"公司与商业"等境内外各类律师榜单,代理的中国法院首例适用外国法律审理外国公司的董事损害小股东权益纠纷案入选上海高院发布的《上海法院域外法查明典型案例》和威科先行"要案头条"。入选上海涉外法律人才库、上海市司法局鼎新法治人才库、上海国有企业改制法律顾问团,具有上市公司独立董事任职资格,系多家知名高校的兼职教授或兼职研究生导师及上海市商务委跨国经营人才培训班讲师。出版《私募股权投资基金风险防控操作实务》等16本投融资法律专著。了解更多

常见法律问题

中美证券清算机构签署谅解备忘录的法律性质与效力如何?

谅解备忘录在中文法律语境下通常被理解为一种不具有强制法律约束力的政策性文件,其核心功能在于表达双方合作意向、确立对话机制并划定合作范围,而非设定可直接执行的权利义务。在本文所述DTCC与SDC的MOU中,双方明确约定“建立证券存管与清算事务合作基础”,并“预期发展更紧密的工作关系”,这表明其性质属于机构间的框架性安排,效力更多体现在促进信息交换、探讨合作项目以及推动技术与业务标准对接等方面。从跨境金融合作实践看,此类MOU往往是后续正式双边协议或具体业务规则的先导,成员国监管机构通常会将其视为沟通与互信的起点。实务中,机构在签署类似文件时应注意明确其是否具有法律约束力条款、保密义务范围、知识产权归属以及争议解决方式,避免因文本模糊导致后续纠纷。对于市场主体而言,MOU本身不直接创设投资者权利或跨境交易资格,其价值在于为未来互联互通机制的形成提供制度铺垫,因此投资者应关注后续实施细则及监管政策变化,而非仅依据MOU作出投资决策。跨境清算合作还涉及适法性判断,需同时遵守双方所在地的证券法、外汇管理及数据跨境传输等规定,故此类合作文件的效力实现高度依赖国内法的衔接与监管许可。

跨境证券投资与清算合作中,境内外投资者面临哪些法律风险与合规要求?

跨境证券投资与清算合作既为投资者拓宽了市场通道,也带来了多重法律风险。第一,准入限制风险。文章提到当时外国投资者投资中国境内市场主要通过香港等国际交易所上市股票,或经由合格境外机构投资者(QFII)制度进行,且额度有限。虽然我国后来逐步放宽外资准入并推出互联互通机制,但投资者仍需满足具体的资格、额度及汇兑要求,否则可能因违反外汇管理规定而导致交易无效或面临行政处罚。第二,结算风险。跨境交易涉及不同时区、币种及清算系统,结算失败可能引发本金风险或流动性风险。MOU所推动的业务联动有助于统一标准、降低此类风险,但投资者仍应关注对手方信用及结算周期差异,选择具备跨境结算能力的托管机构。第三,法律适用与争议解决风险。跨境证券交易可能涉及证券发行地法、交易地法与登记结算地法的冲突,在发生纠纷时需明确准据法与管辖法院。第四,数据合规风险。跨境信息交换必然涉及投资者账户信息、交易数据的传输,需符合两国关于个人信息保护、金融数据出境的强制性规定。第五,市场操纵与内幕交易风险。不同市场对异常交易的监测标准与处罚力度存在差异,跨境投资者可能因不熟悉当地规则而触碰红线。实务中,投资者应聘请熟悉两地法律的专业顾问,建立合规审查机制,并对托管、清算、结算各环节进行细致的合同约定,明确各方责任及风险分配。监管机构之间的合作备忘录通常包含信息共享条款,这有助于提高跨境执法效率,投资者应认识到相关合规义务属于持续性要求,需动态跟踪法律法规变化。

谅解备忘录对推动跨境证券结算机制建设有何作用?常见争议焦点有哪些?

谅解备忘录在跨境证券结算机制建设中扮演“铺路石”角色。文章明确双方合作目标是“促进金融市场繁荣、推动跨境投资、探索存管与清算业务合作及业务联动建设”,这表明MOU提供了制度对话与规则协调的初始框架。通过信息交换,双方可了解彼此的结算流程、风险控制手段及技术标准,进而逐步建立相互认可的衔接机制。例如,DTCC的成熟经验可帮助SDC完善其登记结算体系,使其更接近国际实践,从而降低美国经纪商进入中国市场的适应成本,最终提高资金流动效率。MOU的作用还体现在增强市场透明度与信任,为后续可能达成的双边业务协议奠定政治与行业基础。然而,此类机制建设在实践中面临诸多争议焦点:一是法律效力之争,即MOU是否具有约束力,各方对违约后果的理解可能不一致,需要明确是否构成“君子协定”;二是监管主导权之争,跨境结算涉及两国监管机构的权力边界,彼此间信息共享的范围、保密义务及使用限制常成为谈判难点;三是技术标准与业务规则兼容性之争,例如证券无纸化程度、交收周期、结算币种及担保安排等,双方可能因市场习惯不同而难以统一;四是投资者保护水平差异,若一方市场对结算失败、挪用客户资产等行为的处罚力度较弱,可能引发公平性质疑。为解决上述争议,双方需通过后续正式协议细化规则,同时借助国际清算机构的标准指引,逐步推进跨境结算的连通性。最终,MOU的成功与否取决于双方是否能在尊重各自法律框架的前提下,找到互利共赢的平衡点。

以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn

  • 本站声明:本站所载之法律论文、法律评论、案例、法律咨询等,除非另有注明,著作权人均为站长杨春宝高级律师本人。欢迎其他网站链接,但是,未经书面许可,不得擅自摘编、转载。引用及经许可转载时均应注明作者和出处"法律桥",并链接本站。本站网址:https://law-bridge.net/。
  •  
  •         本站所有内容(包括法律咨询、法律法规)仅供参考,不构成法律意见,本站不对资料的完整性和时效性负责。您在处理具体法律事务时,请洽询有资质的律师。本站将努力为广大网友提供更好的服务,但不对本站提供的任何免费服务作出正式的承诺。本站所载投稿文章,其言论不代表本站观点,如需使用,请与原作者联系,版权归原作者所有。

发表回复